close
close

Le-verdict

News with a Local Lens

Readers discuss Labour’s tuition fee hike and wonder if Kemi will swing further right | UK News
minsta

Readers discuss Labour’s tuition fee hike and wonder if Kemi will swing further right | UK News

Labor has increased tuition fees to £9,535. Potential students could have the choice to do… (Credits: Getty Images)

Give your opinion on this MetroTalk topics and more in the comments.


Labor raised university tuition fees

With the advent of Labor’s increase in university tuition fees – up 3.1 per cent to £9,535 from next October (Metro, Tuesday) – Philip Duval’s comment in MetroTalk, also yesterday , according to which George Osborne and Nick Clegg saddled “an entire generation with almost unpayable fees”. debt by making the fees the highest in the world” has not aged well. Chris, Watford


METRO TALK – GIVE YOUR SAY

Tell us what you think…

Start a text message with VIEWS followed by your comment, name and location to 65700. Standard network charges apply. Or email the helpline [email protected] for views, rush hour crushes and good deeds feeds: 020 3615 0600.

Remember, you are more likely to be published if you provide your name and location along with your

Full terms and conditions here. Metro.co.uk is a member of the Independent Press Standards Organisation. Comments may be edited for legality, clarity, or space.

Will Kemi Badenoch lead the conservatives further to the right?

To view this video, please enable JavaScript and consider switching to a web browser that
supports HTML5 video

The conservative lemmings choseKemi Badenoch as new leaderso they clearly have a death wish.

Expect them to point to everyone but themselves as the reason for our nation’s decline as they move further and further to the right in their frenzied race to outdo the wicked reforms. Guy Wilkins, Richmond

What exactly is a “working person”…?

Mr Prime Minister Keir Starmer and chancellor Rachel Reeves repeatedly promised us that the budget would include “no tax increase for workers“, although he was unable to clarify what a “working person” was.

However, any reasonable person would surely have assumed that those who worked on their own account, risking their own investment to earn a living entirely through their own efforts, would be included in this group. Yet the nearly five million people who are members of a partnership or self-employed through their own limited company will see their taxes rise from next April, a direct result of changes made by Reeves last week .

Employer national insurance contributions are increasing and will be paid by business owners from any wages they receive.

These will also be due on virtually all turnover if their business is subject to IR35 rules – HMRC determining whether a contractor is truly self-employed (they pay less tax) rather than employed (more).

In addition, and due to the lowering of thresholds, a large number of individual entrepreneurs will be drawn into Making Tax Digital – the new government system for digitally capturing tax records throughout the year – with the costs and associated administrative burdens.

In 2000, Tony Blair’s Labor Party managed to keep IR35 under the radar by making no mention of it in its budget.

The Starmer government is trying a similar trick by repeating “no tax rises for workers” while raising taxes on some of the most entrepreneurial and hard-working groups in the economy. Derek, Watford

It’s all about balance

Reader hopes businesses will get by despite Labor budget (Credits: AFP via Getty Images)

Regarding Jimmy and Otto (MetroTalk, Friday) saying the budget was respectively “the biggest money grab” and Labor “hated” the private sector.

There is a balance to be struck between providing public services without stifling the private sector with an upgrade.

Entrepreneurship and innovation will continue under Labor rule government as under the previous one, with the creation of more jobs in new technological industries, contributing to the wealth of the nation and its public services. Martin Hughes, Coventry

Reader challenges frugal Scottish stereotype

I’m appalled by Martin’s lazy racism with his remark that Scots are “careful with money” (MetroTalk, Monday).

Would he have dared to make a similar remark about people of another race or demographic?

No, because that would have been classified as hate speech, and rightly so.

Why is it still considered acceptable to distinguish the Scots in this way? Sandy McPherson, London

MORE : The daily Métro cartoon by Guy Venables

MORE : Why is Donald Trump so orange?

MORE : Glastonbury announces major change to ticket buying process that fans call ‘horrible’